Review OTC 1503A Stinger 2-1/2-Ton Service Jack| Categories | Tools, Home Building |
| Product Code | B000F5HU5S |
| Product Rating |  |
| Price | $121.49 |
| Where To Buy | See More Details |
| Customer Review | See More Reviews |
OTC 1503A Stinger 2-1/2-Ton Service Jack is a new product in Tools - Home Building Supplies. You can get special discount for OTC 1503A Stinger 2-1/2-Ton Service Jack only in this month. But, you can get special discount up to 30% only in this weeks.
Most of the customer reviews speak that the OTC 1503A Stinger 2-1/2-Ton Service Jack are splendid luggage. Also, It Is a pretty well product for the price. It’s great for colony on a tight budget. We’ve found pros and cons on this type of product. But overall, It’s a supreme product and we are well recommend it! When you however want to know more details on this product, so read the reports of those who have already used it.
Please Click on The Image Below To See The Price, Reviews And Videos about OTC 1503A Stinger 2-1/2-Ton Service Jack
- 2-1/2-ton hydraulic service jack with a lifting range of 5 inch to 20 inch is designed for the budget-minded shop owner who still wants the quality of an OTC product
- Built from select steel this jack can stand up to the abuse that jacks are subjected to daily
- Light and compact design makes it easy and convenient to use
- Jack has a built-in safety overload system that prevents use beyond its rated capacity
- With rear swivel casters maneuvering and positioning this jack is an easy task
Customer Reviews
Most helpful customer reviews
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful.
By alexanderaku
I purchased my previous floor jack in 1982, and it has served me very well through the years. That jack was a Japanese made Astroline 2-ton model that I paid under $100 for new. It still looks good and just recently began bypassing under lift weight. After 30 years, it's probably only a minor problem that a new seal somewhere will cure. But, after 30-years, I decided a new jack was in order when I saw I could get a 2 1/2-ton for just over $100.Looking at the new OTC jack and my old Astroline, the two jacks compare favorably. The rear wheels on the new jack are removable and adjustable on the swivel seat, where they are simply welded on the Astroline. The gauge of metals used throughout the two jacks also appears the same, but the OTC saddle is smaller than that on the Astroline. The saddles will interchange just as they will on most shop jacks of this size. The wheels on the OTC are painted black so well I initially thought they were made of some hard composite, but a magnet confirmed they were a ferrous metal. Both of these jacks are similarly heavy and have a like stance with the overall wheel widths on the OTC set at about 10-inches in front and 13-inches on the rear - about one-inch narrower front and rear than my old Astroline. Overall reach from the handle base, in its vertical parked position, to the front of the wheels is about 22-inches. The assembled handle is 39 3/4-inches and the jack base is 26-inches front to rear. From minimum lift to full lift is also very close for each jack. The hydraulic release action is smooth and steady on each jack, and they feel much the same in use - with good power on lifting (when the Astroline is working). All of this means both jacks will feel quite the same to me in use - and I actually like that.However, there are some things I dislike - the gears on the OTC jack aren't as beefy as they are on the old Astroline - but they are held on by a threaded nut and replaceable on the OTC, where they were welded onto the old Astroline. The rear wheel spindles are also a cheap rivet type stamped on shaft supporting the wheels in the swivels. The front wheels are also rounded on the OTC where the Astroline wheel is a wider flat wheel that spreads the weight out over a larger surface area.My new OTC jack arrived in good time from Amazon. It did have some scratches here and there, but the box was still in fair condition. The 12mm bolt that holds the handle on was missing from my order, and there was a small rubber o-ring and a small nylon washer in a package I still can't find a place for. There are good instructions and parts listings in the manual. The bolt is a minor issue as I probably have one lying around somewhere in my garage that will fit. But, that o-ring and washer have worried me - since I haven't seen a place for them - hopefully they are just spares. I rank the overall quality and quality control as good to better, but not excellent - hence my rating of four stars. Still, for just over $100 this is a floor jack that shouldn't be overlooked. It also has a two-year OTC limited warranty. You can register for your product warranty on the OTC site.Note: When I received my new jack it was missing the bolt that holds the handle into the jack as stated, and the decal on the jack lift arm was skinned up some. Rather than put something else in the handle, I decided to call OTC service. They were quick to answer my call and sent the new decal and the proper bolt within two days - great service.Made in China
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful.
By Solar8km
I've owned a variety of floor jacks and the OTC 2-1/2 ton jack is far and away the best yet. Built like tank, and easy to operate, I expect this may be the last jack I'll every need to own. Just be aware that it is not very portable (75lbs) so if you need a jack to tote around from place to place you may want to go with another brand. For thew price though, you can't really do much better.-MZ
6 of 10 people found the following review helpful.
By A. CAFFARELLI
I bought this for my son and was very disappointed when it broke the second time it was used...end of story.
This Page is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.
0 comments:
Post a Comment